Home - About - Contact Toll Free (888) 916-7070

TrustMakers

Justice Is Not Blind
Take the Free Quiz
Change the Font-Size on this pageLargest Article Text SizeLarger Article Text SizeNormal Article Text Size

Email Article Print Article

Justice Is Not Blind.

By Rob Lambert - Email Editor

Date : January 15, 2009

Dear Valued Reader,

Justice is often said to be “blind.” This is usually a reference to the presumed universal fairness of our system and the infinitely wise judges and jurors who make it work. Justice is supposedly administered without regard to race, creed or position in society. Well, nothing could be further from the truth.

Judges and juries are simply not “blind.” In most cases, “the law” does not prevail if it is different from what a judge deems to be fair. I have seen it again and again. Judges and juries don’t care about legal technicalities. They care about using the law to get to the result they prefer, no matter how hard they have to stretch.

If you are naive enough to believe what you were taught in school, that our judicial system is fair, then you are in for a rude awakening if you manage to accumulate some money. Once you have two cents to rub together, you can and will face an attack.

What I wanted to deal with in this newsletter is two common mistakes people who do Asset Protection make. Each of these mistakes is grounded on the unwise presumption that our system is fair.

First mistake: Relying on the bankruptcy system to eliminate your debts after doing Asset Protection Planning.

This is almost always a mistake. When you choose to go before a bankruptcy court, you are dealing with a federal judge who has one job: collecting all of your assets and paying them out to your creditors. Even if you have an old and cold Asset Protection Trust, he will be sorely tempted to order you to turn over the protected funds. Mark my words, many Madoff victims will find themselves owing more than their net worth to the bankruptcy court. If these funds don’t get delivered, and the judge believes that you have the power to get to the protected funds, he will throw you in jail. Don’t ever trust the law to protect you from a pissed off federal judge. He won’t care if the statute of limitations has run or that the trust has a valid business purpose and the Red Cross is the primary beneficiary. Honestly, if he thinks you are a scumbag using technology to disenfranchise creditors, you can expect the judge to be just as creative as a medieval dungeon operator in fashioning remedies designed to set your mind straight. In short, these judges do what they want in most cases. It is never worth the risk to take the chance. Honestly, since your assets are well and truly protected from creditors with a properly done Plan, it is almost never worth the risk to submit your future to an all-powerful federal judge.

Second Mistake: Thinking that any entity will effectively protect real estate if a judge is determined to separate it from you.

I often tell my clients that they could pay me a million dollars to do the best, most fancy multi-tiered Plan in the world and, if the asset they are trying to protect is real estate, this wonderful Plan can all be for naught. Why is that? Simple, the real estate is attached to the ground and cannot be moved. With the simple stroke of a pen, any judge with jurisdiction over the dirt can undo all of my fancy planning. He will bend the law if necessary to provide a justification. With real estate, I always tell my clients that they need to be prepared to extract and protect the equity in the real estate if trouble comes.

The bottom line is that you should never trust our judicial system to be fair. Sometimes, if you can afford it, our system will surprise you and do the right thing. However, never ever count on this.

The beauty of Asset Protection Planning, done correctly, is that you no longer have to trust the judicial system to be fair. You can reserve the right and power to choose the battleground. In short, almost all Plans, no matter how structured, have technology which eliminates the power of the local judges over the protected assets. You can be sure this doesn’t earn you any brownie points with the local judges, but so what? As long as you keep your money and aren’t exposed, personally, to the potential of a contempt order, you have what I would consider a good result. The downside is that you won’t be invited to join the judge’s country club. Again, so what?

So, be careful to always have the power to choose the battleground. Hopefully, if you do this you will never ever have to do battle.

Have a healthy and protected week.

Rob Lambert

RELATED ARTICLES:

ABOUT THIS EDITOR:

Rob Lambert, Founder and former law professor is considered to be foremost expert on tax compliant asset protection structures. A contributing editor to Lexus Nexus debtor creditors series of law books Rob's passion is implement client wealth plans that stand the test of time and hold up under duress.

Full Bio - Email Rob