Home - About - Contact Toll Free (888) 916-7070

TrustMakers

Mecing A Life Insurance Policy
Take the Free Quiz
Change the Font-Size on this pageLargest Article Text SizeLarger Article Text SizeNormal Article Text Size

Email Article Print Article

MECing a Life Insurance Policy Instead of Funding a FIA

By Roccy M. DeFrancesco, JD,CWPP, CAPP, MMB - Email Editor

March 2010
Volume 7

Many advisors use Fixed Indexed Annuities (FIA) for clients 55 and older who want to grow wealth in a conservative manner for retirement. Why? Because FIAs provide clients with "principal protection" (money does not go backwards) and decent upside potential if the stock market performs well (up to a cap). As you know, growth in a FIA is taxed as ordinary income when withdrawn.

On the other hand, for clients under 60, a Cash Value Life (CVL) insurance policy is a typically recommended wealth-building tool because cash inside the a policy grows tax free and can be removed tax free in retirement via policy loans.

For CVL insurance to be a viable tax-favorable retirement vehicle, the policy must be “overfunded” and run with the lowest possible death benefit allowed by the Modified Endowment Contract (MEC) rules. If the insurance policy becomes a MEC, any borrowed funds from the policy in excess of the basis (premiums paid) are treated as taxable income (similar to a tax-deferred annuity).

A MEC is not necessarily a bad thing—most advisors shutter at the thought of a policy becoming a MEC. Why? Because CVL insurance is sold so clients can borrow “tax free” from the policy in retirement. If the money removed from a life insurance policy is treated like an annuity, is that the worst thing in the world? Maybe not.

FIA caps—the caps on FIAs are terrible right now. Annual point-to-point caps on FIAs are down to 4.5%-6.5% (vs. the 7%-12% that they’ve been at times over the last 10 years).

EIUL caps—On the other hand, depending on the policy used, caps on EIUL policies are typically between 10-15%. That is much better than low caps on FIAs, but remember there are mortality costs to a EIUL policy that a FIA does not have.

Living benefits with EIUL—another benefit to EIUL policies vs. FIAs is that an EIUL policy can have significant “living” benefits such as a FREE LTC, critical illness, and terminal-illness rider (if you use the right policy like Revolutionary Life). To learn more about Revolutionary Life, please click here.

Tax-free death benefit—another benefit to using an EIUL policy vs. a FIA is that, when a client dies, the client’s death benefit will pass income tax free to the heirs. With an annuity, all of the growth in the annuity is income taxable to the heirs.

Based on the above benefits of using EIULs vs. FIAs, you are probably ready to go to market with this idea. Right? Well, let’s look at the numbers.

Example—an example is always helpful when understanding the numbers.

Let’s take Dr. Smith who is 55 years old and in good health. Assume he has an extra $100,000 sitting in CDs that he would like to reposition somewhere safe where the money will grow and can be used in retirement. Assume Dr. Smith will fund a one-time premium into both the FIA and into the EIUL policy (Revolutionary Life) where the EIUL policy was designed to be a MEC with a minimum DB.

Which one will provide more retirement income for Dr. Smith when he turns 66 years old?I’m going to assume he will spend down the assets in an equal amount for 20 years.

Let’s assume the FIA returns 5.0% annually and that the EIUL policy has returns of 7.5%. Why the difference in return? Because an EIUL policy has significantly higher caps.

How much can Dr. Smith remove from his FIA? $13,071 each year from ages 66-85 (draining the account value to zero at age 85).

How much can Dr. Smith borrow from his life insurance policy at age 66? $17,314 each year from ages 66-85 (this assumes a 7.5% wash loan and max borrowing).

I found it very interesting that the EIUL policy generated a return that is 32% better than the FIA.

Variable loans—if you know about EIUL policies, you know that they are forecast to have a positive loan arbitrage of in excess of 2% (to learn more about variable loans, please click here). I wanted to give you the numbers if the EIUL policy in my example had a 1% and 2% positive variable loan arbitrage.

-With a 1% positive loan arbitrage, the client could borrow $19,315 each year.

-With a 2% positive loan arbitrage, the client could borrow $21,592 each year.

Summary

A MECed life insurance policy has many advantages over a FIA: 1) higher caps, 2) a tax-free death benefit (which by the way starts at $272,000 in my example above), and 3) a FREE LTC, critical, and terminal-illness rider.

Does the above mean that all clients should use single-premium MECed EIUL policies instead of FIAs? Not necessarily. However, now that you know the numbers, for people under the age of 60, this may be the best option to choose from to grow wealth for retirement.

Feel free to contact us for more information at info@trustmakers.com

By Roccy M. DeFrancesco, JD,CWPP, CAPP, MMB
TrustMakers.com

RELATED ARTICLES:

ABOUT THIS EDITOR:

Roccy DeFrancesco, JD, CWPP, CAPP, MMB - Author and lecturer, Roccy specializes in advanced estate and asset protection planning. Roccy's passion is to teach advisors how to implement lawful strategies that will hold up for the test of time.

Full Bio - Email Roccy